Do I miss my D300? Sure. It’s faster than the D200, where preview is painfully slow. It has a bigger and better display and it has more dynamic range. All true.

And the images? They are different too, at least the JPEGs, but that’s something I don’t care about.

In the end my images get created as much in Photoshop as in the camera. Take this one. Colors were vastly different from what the D300 would have produced, and the tone curve has changed completely. In reality it makes makes no difference though. At any time I have a certain feeling of how my images should look like, and that’s what I make them look like, regardless of the camera used.

The Song of the Day is “Jungleland” from Bruce Springsteen’s 1975 album “Born To Run”. YouTube has a fine 1978 live version, ripped from an old B&W video tape that has been played much too often, complete with thin, hissing audio, but you won’t mind. Believe me, you won’t mind :D

Just a street scene that I saw today. Sorry that I’m not in the mood to elaborate further. It’s after midnight and I am really, really tired :)

The Song of the Day is “High Hopes” by young Scotsman Paolo Nutini. It’s from his 2006 album “Sunny Side Up”. YouTube has a nice live video. And while you’re at it, why not hear some more songs from this fabulous album?

Funny, I had thought these images were from Saturday. Now it turns out I shot them on Friday afternoon. Oh well, I did a lot of work over the weekend, seems I got a little confused.

It’s not that great an image, I just had to take it, because this was the overture to one of the most violent rainfalls that I’ve ever seen. When finally the rain began, I used the time for a pause and a nap. There’s nothing better than sleeping when the rain drums :)

I have not countless, but quite a lot of versions of Harold Arlen’s “Stormy Weather”. Contrary to my normal habit I present a version here, that I don’t own, but it’s a version that I dearly love: Elisabeth Welch’s performance in Derek Jarman’s interpretation of “The Tempest”. Honestly, it’s too long that I saw the film, I can’t remember how it was, but I do remember that scene towards the end (or was it the end?) when Mrs Welch came in and began to sing. Incredible! YouTube has a good version, but of course the effect of the sudden transition is lost. Still, you may like it :)

Here’s one last image taken yesterday. After swimming I made a detour home. Another one of those small roads. This time I knew the road, but I had never been in that quarry.

The Song of the Day is “The Tale Of The Giant Stone Eater” from The Sensational Alex Harvey Band’s 1975 album “Tomorrow Belongs to Me”. YouTube has it for you.

A house was torn down. It happened sometime in winter, I saw it, took some photos, and for months now I have taken images at that place. Only every few weeks, but again and again. One of them even made it (see “1323 – There She Goes, My Beautiful World“), but on average they were rubbish. I could simply have given up, but in such cases I frequently see a certain quality in a scene, a quality that attracts me, but I can’t necessarily explain what it is. Sometimes it is a detail, and often this detail can’t strictly be photographed. My mind isolates it and in my mind it it stands out to a degree, that light and reality can’t support.

I am not sure if it was always this gate, that has fascinated me, but today, when I took this image this morning, today I am sure it was.

Photoshop-wise I have used lots of “Fill light” and “Recover” in Camera RAW, Topaz Adjust’s “Spicify” filter, partially applied with a mask, but the real interesting thing was a “B+W/Blue” adjustment layer, that I put in “Difference” mode. That’s a cool combination, all the B+W filters produce different results, and I could have worked in many different directions. This was one that I really, really liked. Sometimes it’s a good idea to just fool around and see what happens :D

Is this a SoFoBoMo image? Maybe. I had planned to strictly use images from Italy, but I may make exceptions.

The Song of the Day is the beautiful “Heaven’s Gate” from Toni Childs’ 1991 album “House Of Hope”. Hear it on YouTube.

No, this image was not taken with my Tamron 17-50/2.8, but I have made this post part of my review series, because I think you should know, that I have sent it in to Tamron one more time.

You remember the last time, when my bag had fallen from negligible height and the lens barrel broke? Tamron has repaired the lens, the autofocus error is gone, but instead a new problem had appeared:

Often when I turned the camera on, the first image was severely overexposed. Well, this became very frequent in the last few weeks, to an extent where I could be almost certain that the first image or even the first few images would be unusable.

Further study has revealed, that the lens fails to stop down during exposure. You know, while metering and while you look through the viewfinder, the lens is always wide open, in case of the Tamron this means f2.8. Only for the actual exposure the lens stops down to the aperture selected. Or it does not, just like mine. When that happens, the camera exposes for, say, f8, but the lens faultily stays open at f2.8. The result is an overexposure by three full stops.

Now, when I look back, this lens, while it works, is extraordinarily versatile, and the image quality is pretty good as well. On the other hand, I had this autofocus problem (that seems to have been corrected with a firmware update when I sent the lens in the last time) and now I have this problem, that makes the lens completely unusable for street photography.

Would I buy it again? Maybe. Not all of them can be that flimsy, and optically it has brought me through the dark winter like no lens before. Nikon simply has no alternative. I guess it all depends on how well the upcoming Sigma 17-50/2.8 OS will perform. It has just become available for Canon and may come out for Nikon within the next month. Less and less can I imagine to be able to resist :)

Being without the Tamron, I had to switch to another lens, and in this case it was the Nikon 70-300 VR. For a few days I had seen this image, but the Tamron was not the right lens. This cried for a serious telephoto lens. Yesterday I finally took the image. This is one of two exposures. It’s a tad awkward standing in the middle of a crossing :)

The Song of the Day is “Let’s Get High” from Lenny Kravitz’ 2001 album “Lenny”. Very recommendable. Hear it on YouTube.

Thursday we began with a museum in La Spezia‘s Castello San Giorgio. They have one of the two biggest collections of pre-historic “statue stele” in Liguria, most of them having been found in the region of Luni. Photographing the collection was forbidden, of course I did, but please understand that I don’t want to post the images here.

La Spezia is an ugly city with a population of roughly 100,000. There is much heavy industry, an enormous caloric power plant, a military harbor and lots of military everywhere. I suppose the city has been bombed heavily during World War II, at least that’s the impression.

After a short odyssey up the hill to the castle/museum (did it ever occur to you that your blind spot for direction signs only goes away after you have found your target?) and the actual visit, we quickly left for San Terenzo south along the coast (that’s where I took the images of the arrows), and then via Lerici and Marina di Carrara to our main destination: Carrara, home of marble, from ancient times to distant future.

Along the way I spotted the thing on the picture to the left. I have no idea what it is. Remotely it reminds me of Orthanc, though I admit, it is not of black stone but of rusty iron.

Whatever. Carrara was our destination, a small town at the foot of a mountain consisting wholly of marble, and not just any marble, no, the purest and most beautiful marble in the world, quasi the all-time reference of what marble is supposed to be.

The quarries in the mountains above Carrara number by the hundreds, and when you take the winding road, that is used today for transporting the blocks by truck (as opposed to using sledges and ox-carts from Roman times until only 150 years ago), you get the sincere impression, that they are systematically taking apart the whole mountain.

And still, considering the thousands of years, even taking into account the acceleration of the past century, there is so much left, it’s hard to imagine an end to this treasure.

Pretty much at the highest point of the road, at least the highest point that is accessible to the general public, there is a marble museum, a shop and an underground mine that you can visit. We didn’t, we even skipped the museum, but we bought a mortar and pestle :)

The interesting thing in Carrara is, that every quarry looks exactly as if the mountain consisted of nothing but marble. It even may, but then the sheer number of quarries is puzzling. It looks like a whole army of ants trying to eat a mountain, from all sides, chaotic, seemingly without system or order. It’s fascinating.

And in the middle of all that, a village. Colonnata, home to the cavatori, citadell of anarchism, home of the famous Lardo di Colonnata, a white bacon, cured with rosemary in troughs of pure marble.

It’s delicious. Not as salty as bacon is here in Austria, and it is served warm on toasted bread. While we ate, I took the image of the stairs, of course constructed from marble as well.

In fact, the whole village is made of marble. There is a big monument dedicated to “Al Cavatore”, and behind it a small church, all made of marble, and there are these two (and maybe more) inscriptions:

Well, here in the mountains, in this village, then so far off of any city, they found a retreat.

Unlike communism, anarchism never could muster broad support. It’s in its principle, I guess. Not enough organization, too much individualism. Well, having just finished Heinlein’s “The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress”, those marble plates, commemorating the “anarchist companions, fallen on the road to freedom”, somehow touched me deeply.

The image of the truck and the building was made up at the highest point of the street, where the marble museum and the shop are.

The image to the left is an HDR, made from five bracketed exposures. The sun was already low when we stopped at the cemetery, and without HDR, the valley would have been in deep shadows.

Speaking of the cemetery, this is extremely impressive as well. It was the wrong time of the day, I suppose I should be there in the morning, no later than noon, depending on the time of the year. I did not go in, it would have taken me at least an hour, it was already late, light was bad and we had a long way back to Sestri Levante.

I just made a series of images from the other side of the valley, six exposures taken with the Nikon 70-300 VR, and then stitched in Photoshop to this panorama. The “thumbnail” links to an image of 4181 x 768 pixels, the original is 14069 x 2584 pixels. Hmm … I really should try to print it :)

The Song of the Day is a cheap pun: Gershwin’s “Too Marvelous for Words“, interpreted by Frank Sinatra. I have it on “Concepts”, this collection of songs that I bought for, I don’t know what, five Euros? May have been a mistake on Amazon’s side, because some days later it was back to $180 :)

YouTube has the song in a version seemingly taken from a TV show.

Hmm … did I promise a shorter post in the last post? Guess I did. Maybe next time :D

If you follow this blog, you certainly know the view looking out of the window of my study. Well, it’s no more. Sunrise willl never be the same in this place.

We really should be in Genova, Italy, but due to heavy rainfall there, we have decided to skip Genova and only to drive down to the Ligurian Riviera on Saturday. Hope the weather is fine by then :)

The Song of the Day is “The End” from the 1967 self-titled debut album of The Doors. YouTube has the version from the introduction to Apocalypse Now.

Yesterday I asked the flippant question “hey, why not just make a video and upload it?”. Well, for instance because I have no right to do so :)

I wrongly believed that the copyright for those pre-1955 Jazz recordings that I had bought with “The Ultimate Jazz Archive” (or the more recent purchase of those 500 Jazz CDs) had already expired, but that is not so. It may have expired in some countries, but it certainly has not in the US. It took about one hour until the audio track for my “video” was claimed by WMG, and idiot that I am, I even filed a dispute through YouTube’s form.

In the meantime I did some research, and although I hardly know what I’m talking about (so take this with more than a grain of salt), it seems that contrary to my believe, neither the date 1955 nor any number of years play a role here. In the US there is a national law regulating copyright for sound recordings made after 1972, and seemingly everything before is under various (and different!) state laws, and it is so until 2067. “Legal Impediments to Preservation of and Access to the Audio Heritage of the United States” by the US Music Library Association explains it in gruesome detail. They also have an out-of-date but nevertheless informative FAQ about copyright, but as they warn us,

copyright laws are both complex and subtle, and the penalties for mistakes can be severe

and there seems to be no simple, clear and reliable explanation of the situation in the US.

I’m not up to date with what the situation is in Europe. Seemingly we had a copyright expiration after 50 years, and as this would put early Rolling Stones and Beatles recordings into the public domain, the recording industry urges the European Commission to extend copyright to 95 years. I don’t know yet what the current status is (does anybody know?), but it could be that the struggle is still going on. Maybe the people simply lost though.

On the other hand, in our age of the Internet, even the legal situation in the whole of the European Union may be essentially irrelevant. In the case “Capitol Records, Inc. v Naxos of America, Inc.” it was common law of New York that trumped over British copyright law. Of course Naxos was only prohibited of selling the CDs in question in the United States, but it is easy to see an argumentation that YouTube is owned by Google, Google is under the jurisdiction of the US, and therefore common law of New York is applicable to musical content uploaded to YouTube.

Now the question is, what does it mean that Google negotiates with the recording industry? If WMG claims copyright to the song that I uploaded (and contrary to my stupid ideas of yesterday I fully believe them), how do Google’s contracts with WMG change the legal situation? Was it legal for me to upload the song (“Google already paid for it”), or was it infringement anyway? And what is my legal situation? Can they go after me? They most probably wouldn’t, but if they wanted to, could they? What exactly is the nature of the protection that comes from Google’s contracts with the recording industry? Do they protect only Google or does the protection include the uploader?

Wherever you look, everybody who explains the sitaution (even Google themselves in their help pages on YouTube), makes all too sure that nothing is legally binding in any way. As you can imagine from the nature of this blog, these are very important questions for me. Any pointers that you can give me are welcome. Basically the question is, can I go on uploading “videos” of songs that I use as “Song of the Day” on my blog?

So far my practice was, to use only songs that already are on YouTube. Of course that’s a coward’s position, and now I really want to figure it out once and for all time.

The Song of the Day is “There She Goes, My Beautiful World” from the truly sensational 2004 Nick Cave double album “Abattoir Blues/Lyre Of Orpheus”. No need to step out of my comfortable safety, YouTube already had the song :)

Well, actually I’m not. I finally have my Tamron 17-50/2.8 VC back. Tamron repaired it under warranty. Pretty nice, I’d say.

I’ve tried it out, everything works as it used to and as it should. Focus is precise, stabilization is excellent, sharpness is outstanding. No problems at all.

If you came here because I’ve tagged this post as part of my Tamron 17-50/2.8 VC Review, well, that’s pretty much everything I have to say today. I just remember having reported the damage in one of the review posts, thus I think I have to report the outcome as well.

Of course the actual image was not made with the Tamron but with the Sigma 150/2.8 Macro.

The Song of the Day is “I Am Waiting” from the 1966 Rolling Stones album “Aftermath”. I have the UK version, the original version, I might say, thus I link to that. Hear the song on YouTube.

© 2010 Andreas Manessinger Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha