Having lost the stabilized 17-50/2.8 feels … exciting. I almost have not used any other lens since November 6 when I bought the Tammy, and now that I must, I begin to change frequently again. I absolutely love it.

This is a still-life from the window of some esoteric shop here in Vienna’s 7th district, the only place in Austria where the Green Party rules. In a way this is the most impossible place in Austria, our very own San Francisco :)

The Song of the Day is Paul Heaton’s “The People Who Grinned Themselves To Death“. Heaton was then, in 1987, lead singer of The Housemartins, the same Paul Heaton who later was The Beautiful South. It’s not the first time we had him, it won’t be the last time. YouTube has the song.

I’m on the train to Carinthia now, and this is yesterday’s image. The interesting thing with this Christmas decoration in Neubaugasse is, that it is now up all year. It’s not particularly specific to Christmas, no stars, no candles, no angels, and so they let it hang all the time last year.

Normally I don’t like Christmas decoration, and actually I don’t like how holidays that really have lost all their meaning for most people, are turned into a shopping frenzy. There is something dishonest in calling that time the “silent time” when in reality the advertising machinery is aggressively loud and unescapable. Well, it’s one of the privileges of those without children, to be able to at least try to ignore the whole thing :)

The Song of the Day is “All The Time“, once more from Tom Waits’ 2006 three-CD masterpiece “Orphans”. Hear it on YouTube.

Sunday progressed pretty like Saturday. There was a short time of sun, but when I left home, it was already over. I made some wide-angles of a bridge and hoped to get away with it.

In the evening, like all Sundays, I took the taxi to the railway station and found … no train. Hmm … December 8 is a Catholic holiday, and 20 years ago the shops used to be closed. Not so any more, but many people still have the day off, especially in public service. This makes Monday a bridge day that people also tend to take off, thus creating a long weekend, and that, of course, lowers traffic, which ultimately made the railway company eliminate my train.

Instead of using the taxi back, I took a nice walk in the dark, through Villach’s well-decorated center. That’s where I made these images.

It’s Monday now, almost 2pm, and I am finally on the train to Vienna, having taken the day off myself.

The Song of the Day is “A Walk In The Dark” from David Byrne’s 1992 album “Uh-Oh”. I know, I have already used this song and it would not have been that hard to find another title, but it’s so good, I just had to :)

Hear it as the second part of this video on YouTube.

Sorry for the delay, this is the post for Saturday. Both images are from Saturday morning, the Image of the day taken from my study, the other from the balcony. Nice sun, but that was the last we had that day.

The fog rose within minutes, and for the rest of the day it stayed as a grayish-white blanket in a height above 100 meters, and when it really thinned out for some minutes, I could see clouds above, thus it didn’t even make sense to drive up a mountain.

I had to go shopping that afternoon, and hoping to get some winter landscape images, I tried my luck down at the river.

It was depressing. Snowy winter landscapes can be a great sight, and you don’t need sun at all. Take for example “792 – Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow” or “778 – My! My! Time Flies!“. Both were made on bleak winter days, but at least there was a thick snow cover. The real problem with days like Saturday is, that there is not enough snow, and what there is, quickly goes away, leaving patches of brilliant white between dark, wet ground, wet wood and soggy dead leaves. It’s pretty hard to make interesting images of that.

OK, this should be enough to explain why I post these images: I have no others. I’ve tried and failed. But why this title?

On just that Saturday Paul Butzi posted an article about popularity, concluding that it

appears that if you want to get a large readership, the thing to do is write posts that take a contrary view on a social issue, write lots of equipment reviews, reviews of materials, and vitriolic rants about stuff that frustrates you

As I commented on Paul’s post, it’s the same here. At the moment I get more hits than usual, and the popular posts of the moment are those about the Tamron 17-50/2.8 VC. It’s pretty obvious why, because there is not much material on the Internet about this lens, and at the same time there is much interest, because the lens seemingly fills a gap, at least in Nikon’s lineup.

More or less the same happened when I bought the D300. I got it the day after it appeared, and my series of posts was one of the first sources on the Internet. I’ve tagged it a review, but of course it was mainly a set of observations of a user, but exactly that is what people are looking for, especially in a time when it is hard to tell journalism apart from PR.

Photoshop tutorials are another classic. I’ve posted a few, and they still contribute a substantial part of the hits.

Joe Jarosak (sorry, you didn’t leave a link) replied to my comment, saying

Andreas please don’t play to your audience I enjoy your blog to hear why you might have photographed what you present. Same with Paul’s blog, I’m not interested in the tools so much but the results they produce and the thinking behind them.

And the music of course. ;)

Thanks, very appreciated. I promise, I won’t post any “10 Top Point’n'Shoot Cameras Of This Winter”, and I will also not write about the “Rule of Thirds” and other “rules” of composition. Basically I know how to get hits, I know what draws them, but ultimately it does not matter that much to me. I try to post things that interest me, try to get some feedback, try to connect with people, but not at any price.

On the other hand, as Amy Sakurai wrote in her comment to Paul’s post,

readership numbers greater than zero are about all I look for… otherwise I can just keep my babblings locally on my own computer

Well, this goes right to the heart of blogging. Why do we do that? Why do I do it? I mean, for at least some people, blogging is a source of income. Mike Johnston comes to mind and of course Ken Rockwell. Other people use their blogs to advertise their main business. Just think of David Ziser or Joe McNally.

I don’t do that. I don’t support a business. If you want a print of one of my images, you can just contact me and we’ll arrange something, or of some images you can get them via the Fine Art Photoblog. If you don’t want my prints, well, we can still be friends :)

Do I do it for the ads? Oh dear, don’t be silly. There is no money in that either. I suppose it gets interesting when your readers number in the tens of thousands, but what I write is read by a small number of hundreds per day. So far my ads have not generated enough income that I even have bothered to collect it :)

Then why do I do it?

I think a part of the answer lies in my desire to communicate with people who are interested in the same things that I am interested in. Or variations thereof. The problem is, you can’t communicate with yourself only. You need an audience. It’s the first hurdle that every blog has to overcome.

When I began blogging, I was relatively active at the forums of the now gone Radiant Vista, and my trick was to change my forum signature daily, always containing the titles of the three latest posts as links. It took some time, then people noticed and began to visit.

With this and similar PR, I have managed to come into safe territory, having a readership definitely beyond zero, and that while doing what I want to do.

And suddenly we are back to Saturday’s pictures. If you look closely at #2, the house, you see my Imaginary Friend, the friendly snowman. It’s only about two weeks until Christmas, and you see an incredible lot of decoration here, all lit in the evening, and although this is kitsch of the worst kind, this snowman somehow touches me.

There is something symbolic in this mute, friendly smile of the plastic snowman, something deep, pointing to our desire to communicate, pointing to a certain remoteness, a remoteness that is also in blogging. We stand there on our balconies, smiling friendly, waving, hoping there’s someone, who will wave back.

That’s not bad and I like it :)

The Song of the Day is “Hope There’s Someone” from Antony And The Johnsons’ 2005 album “I Am a Bird Now”. See him live on YouTube.



I’m learning. We all do, and that pretty much all of the time, but I am learning about image resizing now.

For my new site I need downscaled versions of my images. I think I’ll provide the same sizes as SmugMug does. Using my image database IMatch, I have copied all my JPEG files tagged “Submissions.SmugMug” to a new directory. From there I want to batch-resize them into directories 0150×0150, 0400×0400, 0600×0600, 0800×0800 and 1024×1024. The obvious choice for that job is Photoshop’s Image Processor. At least that’s what I thought.

I had already done all those conversions for all sizes, but when I compared my results to the images on SmugMug, they were pretty poor. Well, you can say all sorts of things about SmugMug’s current stability, but one thing is for sure: they damn well know how to resize images. I tried for more than an hour to get similar results in Photoshop, I tried to vary the JPEG quality, I tried to apply different levels of sharpening, all in vain. SmugMug’s images still looked better. Not by much, but it was noticeable.

Finally I had the idea to try IrfanView, my favorite image viewer. And really, not only does it have a batch facility that can resize (and a hundred things more), not only that the quality matches that of SmugMug’s versions, no, it is also much, much faster than Photoshop, uses less resources and does not block the computer while it runs. In fact I am converting 2164 images to a bounding box of 600×600 pixels right now, in the background and while I write this blog entry. OK, one problem solved :)

The Song of the Day is “Ribbon In The Sky” by Stevie Wonder. I have it on the collection “Original Musiquarium I”. For whatever reasons it was never followed by a number two. Hear it on YouTube.



OK, as predicted, here’s another image made with the Nikon 85/1.8, and most probably the last for quite some time :)

Actually this lens is quite OK when you know about its limitations. The most annoying thing is probably the purple fringing, something that many of the older Nikon primes supposedly exhibit when used wide open. I can’t tell, the 50/1.8 and the 50/1.2 don’t, but I remember having read it about the 24/2.8 and the 28/2.8. Anybody who knows?

Anyway. With this lens the rule is simple: avoid all extreme point highlights that would burn out, then you should be on safe ground. Raindrops in sunlight are about as deadly as it gets :)

Actually I really should not complain at all. This is a portrait lens like its big brother, the 85/1.4, and that means its failures work very well in a portrait situation, where utter contrast and sharpness are probably unwelcome anyway. In fact, it is really not a lack of sharpness, it is a lack of micro contrast, just like a softening veil. There you have it: fine for traditional portraits, not so fine for everything else.

The Song of the Day is the Robert Johnson classic “They’re Red Hot“, today interpreted by the legendary Peter Green on his 2004 album “Hot Foot Powder”, the second in the line of his Robert Johnson albums. Deezer has the whole album for you to hear.



Three weeks ago, the morning after the first real snowfall, my first view out of the bedroom window was greeted by the friendly smile of a snowman. Alas, in the evening he was already missing arms, and the next morning rain had reduced him to a small, indistinct heap of snow. Still, I’ll remember this smile as something that went into my heart.

I can’t see today’s snowman from the bedroom, but whenever I look out of the living room, I see him, waving his arm, wishing me a good morning or a good night, and – call me sentimental, call me senile (I’d sure have, years ago) – I like this snowman. Sometimes I wave back and smile.

The image is an HDR from five bracketed exposures, shot from the tripod with the Nikon 70-300 VR (oops, I failed to de-activate VR, but it does not seem to matter with this lens), tone-mapped in Photomatix Pro 3.1, blended with the original middle exposure, and then some usual stuff applied.

Sometimes I’m asked with incredulity “What? You don’t know the band XYZ??”, and it’s true, although they’ve produced mega-hits (is anything not mega today?), I may still have never heard of them. I don’t hear radio, I almost don’t look TV, I have no children, I don’t read music magazines. Years ago you found me browsing the shelves of music stores, but now I mostly buy my music through Amazon. Most music stores have closed anyway, or if not, they have fired most of their staff, and now display just the “mega-hits” of the current “mega-stars”.

It’s just as well. If something is really good, I’ll find it sooner or later. I found the Cowboy Junkies only 20 years after their inception via Bill Birtch, I find much by browsing lists and recommendations on Amazon, I find thing by chance, I get personal recommendations, don’t worry, instead of drying up, I have to restrict myself to not browse too much.

Catatonia is such a band that I found by chance, browsing the shelves of a local media store. Today’s Song of the Day “Imaginary Friend” is from their 2001 album “Paper Scissors Stone”. I bought it when it was new, forgot about the band, and only now, while looking the album up on Amazon, I found that they already broke up. Well, at least they seem to have been quite productive in their time.

I found no video, but Deezer has the complete song on some “Platinum Collection“.



I’m sorry, I’m a bit late. This is the image of yesterday, Friday. I began taking images on the train from Vienna, while waiting for its departure, but they did not turn out too well. This one is from a series that I shot after having arrived in Velden, Carinthia. It’s a pillar on the terrace of a café, just opposite of Velden’s casino. They have still Christmas decorations on, and the small point lights are a good match for the Lensbaby’s distortions.

It’s been a long time since I last used the Lensbaby. The Lensbaby is a very simple 50/2.0, but instead of a normal lens barrel, it has a flexible tube. Additionally the lens has very strong natural distortions, throwing everything but the center out of focus. That’s what we call the “sweet spot”. By bending the lens you can move the sweet spot, but it’s not only that. The more you bend the lens, the more you increase the distortions. A characteristic of the Lensbaby is the egg-shaped rendition of out-of-focus point lights, and the art now is, to bend the lens in a way that these highlights create meaningful or aesthetic patterns.

In this case I have tried to let shadows point into the corners, have a stone there on the lower right, and let the lights point into the last corner. This is the image right out of the camera. 1/30s at ISO 1000.

The Song of the Day is “Baby, Why not” from Marcia Ball’s 2003 album “So Many Rivers“.



Oh well! Yesterday I bleated something about being curious how long I would be able to resist the lure of the D300, and six hours later I had it :)

And I didn’t even lie! Honestly. In the morning I’d had no idea that I would buy it so early. I had the idea to first read all the reviews, go to a shop and try to shoot some images on my own card, analyze them at home and figure out if there is really so much improvement from the D200, that it would rectify the purchase, and blah, blah, blah …

Is it so much better?

I have not done very much with it so far, but some things are already clear:

The new LCD is a dramatic improvement, and so is the new 100% viewfinder. These two alone would have been reason enough.

Automatic white balance has been greatly improved. Even at night on the street I get very natural colors. On the D200 it was almost always off, mostly much too yellow, but the opposite could be true as well. On the D300 it’s nothing short of amazing.

ISO 1600 was usable before, but needed a lot of post-processing. In night shots, applying Noise Ninja alone was normally not enough. Now I’d still apply noise reduction to some parts of the image (the out-of-focus background in this image for example), but for the sizes displayed on the web, I could as well use the image as out of the camera. It’s more that I already was in Photoshop, so I took care of the noise as well. Is it dramatic? Well, yes, because it’s unbelievable how much detail you can get out of the shadows of an ISO 200 (the base sensitivity) shot. ISO 3200 is better than ISO 1600 was, and of course it’s absolutely usable. ISO 6400 is worse, but may yield usable results, that depends upon the actual light. For documentary purposes I’d take it all the time, for artistic, we’ll see.

There’ll be more.

Nikon D300 with Nikon 18-200 VR at 200mm, f6.3, 1/400s and ISO 1600.

The Song of the Day is “Blow Wind Blow”, not from Tom Wait’s “Frank’s Wild Years”, no, from “Dr. John’s Gumbo“.



Wouldn’t it be much better if I could write about the “heat” of the night? OK, a guy may dream, yeah?

Yesterday we had Christmas decoration in Josefstädter Straße as seen in the morning, plus a nighttime view from last year, today it’s another night shot.

What else? Oh, the Nikon D300 has come to Austria (and everywhere else). What a difference to the launch of the D200. Then it was almost impossible to get one for months, today I have seen it in two shops that I’ve come by, and one of them had two of it in the window. It looks good. Very good. I’m curious for how long I’ll be able to resist :)

The Song of the Day is “The Beat Of The Night” by Bob Geldof. I have it on the excellent compilation “Loudmouth“. The Germans have a sound sample.

© 2010 Andreas Manessinger Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha