Comments on: 1010 – Sunday http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html The Daily Photography – One image per day, shot that day Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:04:27 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andreas http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html/comment-page-1#comment-3189 Andreas Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:47:02 +0000 http://manessinger.com/?p=1025#comment-3189 Thanks, Barry. Well, so much of what I do depends on chance, sometimes I find a lot of interesting things, sometimes it's harder. But I'm glad you like it :) Thanks, Barry. Well, so much of what I do depends on chance, sometimes I find a lot of interesting things, sometimes it's harder. But I'm glad you like it :)

]]> By: Barry Armer http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html/comment-page-1#comment-3188 Barry Armer Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:29:23 +0000 http://manessinger.com/?p=1025#comment-3188 Another great shot Andreas!<br /><br />You're having an outstanding month in July based on the photos you've posted to the blog so far! Everything you've posted is quite wonderful! Maybe your best month ever?<br /><br />Keep up the great work!<br /><br />Cheers!<br />Barry Another great shot Andreas!

You're having an outstanding month in July based on the photos you've posted to the blog so far! Everything you've posted is quite wonderful! Maybe your best month ever?

Keep up the great work!

Cheers!
Barry

]]> By: Andreas http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html/comment-page-1#comment-3187 Andreas Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:24:46 +0000 http://manessinger.com/?p=1025#comment-3187 Well, those guys move in the wind. It does not even need much wind at all. The 2.8 version had the focus a tad too far behind. The 5.6 version nailed the focus, but the background was far more busy. Combining fixed both.<br /><br />No, the two exposures have the same EV. I got the tones by using a b+w conversion adjustment layer with strong blue filter and multiplying the result. There's also a gradient map involved, my usual toning, but dialed back to 50%. Well, those guys move in the wind. It does not even need much wind at all. The 2.8 version had the focus a tad too far behind. The 5.6 version nailed the focus, but the background was far more busy. Combining fixed both.

No, the two exposures have the same EV. I got the tones by using a b+w conversion adjustment layer with strong blue filter and multiplying the result. There's also a gradient map involved, my usual toning, but dialed back to 50%.

]]> By: Jean Marcel http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html/comment-page-1#comment-3186 Jean Marcel Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:58:42 +0000 http://manessinger.com/?p=1025#comment-3186 I agree with Thomas, Nice tonalities! I'm also impressed with the texture of the image. It feels like I can touch this!<br /><br />I have a question: the two exposures also have different EV? I agree with Thomas, Nice tonalities! I'm also impressed with the texture of the image. It feels like I can touch this!

I have a question: the two exposures also have different EV?

]]> By: Thomas http://manessinger.com/2009/07/1010-sunday.html/comment-page-1#comment-3185 Thomas Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:27:09 +0000 http://manessinger.com/?p=1025#comment-3185 Nice tonalities! Reminds a bit on the coming autumn and the harvest. OMG, is it already that late in the year...?<br /><br />You couldn't resist the temptation to combine at least photos with two different apertures, huh? ;) Nice tonalities! Reminds a bit on the coming autumn and the harvest. OMG, is it already that late in the year…?

You couldn't resist the temptation to combine at least photos with two different apertures, huh? ;)

]]>